| Records |
| Author |
Mockett, L.; Horsfall, J.; O'Callaghan, W. |
| Title |
Education leadership in the clinical health care setting: A framework for nursing education development |
Type |
Journal Article |
| Year |
2006 |
Publication |
Nurse Education in Practice |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
6 |
Issue |
6 |
Pages |
404-410 |
| Keywords |
Organisational change; Law and legislation; Nursing; Education; Leadership |
Abstract  |
This paper describes how a new framework for clinical nursing education was introduced at Counties Manukau District Health Board. The project was initiated in response to the significant legislative and post registration nursing education changes within New Zealand. The journey of change has been a significant undertaking, and has required clear management, strong leadership, perseverance and understanding of the organisation's culture. The approach taken to managing the change had four stages, and reflects various change management models. The first stage, the identification process, identified the impetus for change. Creating the vision is the second stage and identified what the change would look like within the organisation. To ensure success and to guide the process of change a realistic and sustainable vision was developed. Implementing the vision was the third stage, and discusses the communication and pilot phase of implementing the nursing education framework. Stage four, embedding the vision, explores the process and experiences of changing an education culture and embedding the vision into an organisation. The paper concludes by discussing the importance of implementing robust, consistent, strategic and collaborative processes that reflect and evaluate best educational nursing practice. |
| Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1036 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Muir-Cochrane, E.; Holmes, C.; Walton, J.A. |
| Title |
Law and policy in relation to the use of seclusion in psychiatric hospitals in Australia and New Zealand |
Type |
Journal Article |
| Year |
2002 |
Publication |
Contemporary Nurse |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
13 |
Issue |
2/3 |
Pages |
136-145 |
| Keywords |
Psychiatric Nursing; Law and legislation; Policy; Patient rights; Cross-cultural comparison |
| Abstract |
This paper discusses legal issues associated with the seclusion of acutely disturbed patients in psychiatric hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. There continues to be great variation in opinion and operational definition as to whether seclusion is a medical treatment, nursing intervention and management tool, or merely a form of situational restraint. Reflecting this lack of clarity, mental health acts and policies concerning the regulation and practice of seclusion lack consistency and focus across geographical boundaries and jurisdictions. Australian and New Zealand legislation and institutional policy is discussed in order to shed light on the contemporary issues highlighted by this controversial nursing practice. The authors note that mental health professionals must continue to review the practice of seclusion and to actively promote the use of acceptable alternatives. In addition nurses and other mental health professionals have a responsibility to understand current legislation and policy frameworks and to influence change where this is necessary to ensure the best practice possible in their clinical area. |
| Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1074 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Lewis, T. |
| Title |
Euthanasia: A Foucauldian analysis |
Type |
|
| Year |
2005 |
Publication |
|
Abbreviated Journal |
ScholarlyCommons@AUT |
| Volume |
|
Issue |
|
Pages |
|
| Keywords |
Law and legislation; Euthanasia; Ethics; Pain management; Terminal care; Nursing; Palliative care |
| Abstract |
This study drew upon the theoretical insights of Michel Foucault to provide a discursive analysis of the term euthanasia, and the issues surrounding the “right-to-die”. It involved an analysis of primary texts from; nursing, general, and legal literature as well as the media between the years 2002-2004. Drawing upon data researched, the study analyses the main discourses regarding the practice of euthanasia for terminally ill individuals. The two competing discourses that emerged were what the author termed the sanctity-of life-discourse and the right-to-die discourse. The aim of the study was to uncover the discourses understanding of “truth” regarding the right-to-die. The analysis revealed that a small percentage of cancer sufferers (5%) die with their pain insufficiently treated and the right-to-die discourse claims that no individual should have to suffer needlessly, asserting the individuals right to autonomy. Directly opposing this is the sanctity-of life-discourse which states all life is sacred and nothing can justify euthanasia as an acceptable practice in society. These findings indicate the need for effective palliative care and pain management when caring for the terminally ill individual. The legal, ethical and moral implications of euthanasia are many and this study discusses the effects these may have on health professionals involved with the care of terminally ill patients. The study revealed an increasing deployment of the right-to-die discourse in the media and revealed concerns regarding the nursing profession's lack of preparation to deal with euthanasia if it becomes a legal option in end of life care. |
| Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1226 |
| Permanent link to this record |
