| Home | << 1 >> |
|
| Records | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Quiding, Janine | ||||
| Title | Improving assessment inter-rater reliability of a nursing ePortfolio: An Integrative Review | Type | Book Whole | ||
| Year | 2021 | Publication | Abbreviated Journal | ||
| Volume | Issue | Pages | 66 p. | ||
| Keywords | ePortfolios; Professional Development and Recognition Programmes (PDRP); Nursing assessment | ||||
| Abstract | Analyses 13 articles using an integrative review methodology framework and thematic analysis to support the data analysis process, seeking to clarify the inter-rater reliability of nursing ePortfolio assessment. Identifies two themes emerging from the data: the subjective nature of the assessor, and external factors due to the nature of nursing portfolio requirements. Considers how to minimise assessment variability due to subjective factors. | ||||
Call Number  |
NZNO @ research @ | Serial | 1749 | ||
| Permanent link to this record | |||||
| Author | Heath, S.; Clendon, S.; Hunter, R. | ||||
| Title | Fit for educational purpose? : the findings of a mixed methods study of nurses' decisions to participate in professional development and recognition programmes | Type | Journal Article | ||
| Year | 2020 | Publication | SCOPE (Health and Wellbeing) | Abbreviated Journal | |
| Volume | 5 | Issue | Pages | 50-59 | |
| Keywords | Professional Development and Recognition Programmes (PDRP); Nursing education | ||||
| Abstract | Reports findings from a mixed-methods study that examined nurses' decisions to participate in a PDRP. Considers the obstacles nurses face when making the decision to submit a portfolio and asks whether PDRP is still fit for purpose. | ||||
| Call Number |
NZNO @ research @ | Serial | 1775 | ||
| Permanent link to this record | |||||