| Records |
| Author |
Rose, A. |
| Title |
Is case management an efficient and effective model of care for complex patients in an acute medical setting? |
Type |
|
| Year |
2000 |
Publication |
|
Abbreviated Journal |
Victoria University of Wellington Library |
| Volume |
|
Issue |
|
Pages |
|
| Keywords |
Clinical decision making; Culture; Nursing; Quality assurance |
| Abstract |
This thesis looks at the prospect of developing and implementing case management as a model of care for complex patients in an acute medical setting. An extensive literature review was conducted to explore the concept of case management and to identify the role of the case manager, including the qualities and qualifications required for the position. Clinical pathways are a tool used in case management so these are also included in the literature review. As the author had been involved in the development of the first clinical pathway for Hutt Valley Health, this is used as an example to clarify how case management and clinical pathways can be used in conjunction. A discussion chapter examines the advantages and disadvantages of case management which shows that it can be an effective and efficient model of care through the development of clinical pathways. The ethical implications of case management are also considered. The thesis concludes with recommendations for the continued development of case management as a model of care to improve the quality of care for both patients and the organisation. During the course of the thesis, other areas that are worth further investigation have also been identified, such as the relevance of case management to different cultures. The thesis suggests that a proposal for case management for complex patients in the acute care setting is developed along with a job description for the role of the case manager. |
| Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
908 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Rose, L.; Nelson, S.; Johnston, L.; Presneill, J.J. |
| Title |
Workforce profile, organisation structure and role responsibility for ventilation and weaning practices in Australia and New Zealand intensive care units |
Type |
Journal Article |
| Year |
2008 |
Publication |
Journal of Clinical Nursing |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
17 |
Issue |
8 |
Pages |
1035-1043 |
| Keywords |
Advanced nursing practice; Clinical decision making; Intensive care nursing; Cross-cultural comparison |
| Abstract |
The aim of this research is to provide an analysis of the scope of nursing practice and inter-professional role responsibility for ventilatory decision-making in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units (ICU). Self-administered questionnaires were sent to nurse managers of eligible ICUs within Australia and New Zealand. Survey responses were available from 54/180 ICUs. The majority (71%) were located within metropolitan areas and categorised as a tertiary level ICU (50%). The mean number of nurses employed per ICU bed was 4.7 in Australia and 4.2 in New Zealand, with 69% (IQR: 47-80%) of nurses holding a postgraduate specialty qualification. All units reported a 1:1 nurse-to-patient ratio for ventilated patients with 71% reporting a 1:2 nurse-to-patient ratio for non- ventilated patients. Key ventilator decisions, including assessment of weaning and extubation readiness, were reported as predominantly made by nurses and doctors in collaboration. Overall, nurses described high levels of autonomy and influence in ventilator decision-making. Decisions to change ventilator settings, including FiO(2) (91%, 95% CI: 80-97), ventilator rate (65%, 95% CI: 51-77) and pressure support adjustment (57%, 95% CI: 43-71), were made independently by nurses. The authors conclude that the results of the survey suggest that, within the Australian and New Zealand context, nurses participate actively in ventilation and weaning decisions. In addition, they suggest, the results support an association between the education profile and skill-mix of nurses and the level of collaborative practice in ICU. |
| Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
962 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Walsh, K.; Moss, C.; Lawless, J.; McKelvie, R.; Duncan, L. |
| Title |
Puzzling practice: A strategy for working with clinical practice issues |
Type |
Journal Article |
| Year |
2008 |
Publication |
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
14 |
Issue |
2 |
Pages |
94-100 |
| Keywords |
Nursing philosophy; Clinical decision making; Problem solving |
| Abstract |
The authors share the evolution of innovative ways to explore, 'unpack' and re-frame clinical issues that exist in everyday practice. The elements of these processes, which they call 'puzzling practice', and the techniques associated with them, were delineated over a two year period by the authors using action theory based processes. The authors have evolved several different frameworks for 'puzzling practice' which they draw on and use in their practice development work and in research practice. This paper pays attention to a particular form of puzzling practice that they found to be useful in assisting individual clinicians and teams to explore and find workable solutions to practice issues. In this example 'puzzling practice' uses seven different elements; naming the issue; puzzling the issue; testing the puzzle; exploring the heart of out practice; formulating the puzzle question; visualising the future; and generating new strategies for action. Each of the elements is illustrated by the story and the key foundations and ideas behind each element is explored. |
| Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
838 |
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
| Author |
Woods, M. |
| Title |
Balancing rights and duties in 'life and death' decision making involving children: A role for nurses? |
Type |
Journal Article |
| Year |
2001 |
Publication |
Nursing Ethics |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
| Volume |
8 |
Issue |
5 |
Pages |
397-408 |
| Keywords |
Parents and caregivers; Children; Ethics; Clinical decision making; Nurse-family relations; Chronically ill |
| Abstract |
This article examines a growing number of cases in New Zealand in which parents and guardians are required to make life and death ethical decisions on behalf of their seriously ill child. Increasingly, nurses and other practitioners are expected to more closely inform, involve and support the rights of parents or guardians in such situations. Differing moral and ethical values between the medical team and parents or guardians can lead to difficult decision making situations. The article analyses the moral parameters, processes, outcomes and ethical responses that must be considered when life and death ethical decisions involving children are made. It concludes with a recommendation that nurses should be recognised as perhaps the most suitable of all health care personnel when careful mediation is needed to produce an acceptable moral outcome in difficult ethical situations. |
| Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1086 |
| Permanent link to this record |
