| |
Records |
Links |
|
Author |
Wareham, P.; McCallin, A.; Diesfeld, K. |
|
| |
Title |
Advance directives: The New Zealand context |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2005 |
Publication |
Nursing Ethics |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
12 |
Issue |
4 |
Pages |
349-359 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Law and legislation; Patient rights; Nursing; Ethics |
|
| |
Abstract |
Advance directives convey consumers' wishes about accepting or refusing future treatment if they become incompetent. There are associated ethical issues for health practitioners and this article considers the features that are relevant to nurses. In New Zealand, consumers have a legal right to use an advance directive that is not limited to life-prolonging care and includes general health procedures. Concerns may arise regarding a consumer's competence and the document's validity. Nurses need to understand their legal and professional obligations to comply with an advance directive. What role does a nurse play and what questions arise for a nurse when advance directives are discussed with consumers? This article considers the cultural dimensions, legal boundaries, consumers' and providers' perspectives, and the medical and nursing positions in New Zealand. |
|
| |
Call Number  |
NRSNZNO @ research @ 1069 |
Serial |
1054 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Malcolm, H. |
|
| |
Title |
Patient privacy in a shared hospital room: Right or luxury? |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2004 |
Publication |
Nursing Praxis in New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
20 |
Issue |
1 |
Pages |
28-35 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Patient rights; Law and legislation; Nursing; Hospitals |
|
| |
Abstract |
In this article the author discusses the New Zealand legislation aimed at protecting the individual's right to privacy and concludes that practice may place healthcare consumers' rights at risk. While patient privacy should be of concern to all health professionals, the focus here is on the nurse's role in relation to recently formulated competencies published by the Nursing Council of New Zealand, which includes the recommendation that care be seen to exhibit an awareness of healthcare consumers' rights to privacy alongside the expectation that nurses question practices that compromise patient privacy. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ 562 |
Serial |
548 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Carryer, J.B.; Boyd, M. |
|
| |
Title |
The myth of medical liability for nursing practice |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2003 |
Publication |
Nursing Praxis in New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
19 |
Issue |
4-12 |
Pages |
4-12 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Interprofessional relations; Law and legislation; Nurse practitioners; Advanced nursing practice |
|
| |
Abstract |
This article explores the complex nature of liability in the case of standing orders and vicarious liability by employers, and also when nurses and doctors are in management roles. The authors address misconceptions about medico-legal responsibility for nursing practice with the advent of nurse prescribers and nurse practitioners. They refer to the submission made by the College of Nurses Aotearoa (NZ) on the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act (2003), and discuss practice liability and nurse-physician collaboration. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ 624 |
Serial |
610 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
