NZ Nursing Research Database
Home
|
Show All
|
Simple Search
|
Advanced Search
Login
Quick Search:
Field:
main fields
author
title
publication
keywords
abstract
contains:
...
1–2 of 2 records found matching your query (
RSS
):
Search & Display Options
Search within Results:
Field:
author
title
year
keywords
abstract
type
publication
volume
issue
pages
thesis
publisher
place
editor
notes
contains:
...
Exclude matches
Display Options:
Field:
all fields
keywords & abstract
additional fields
records per page
Select All
Deselect All
<<
1
>>
List View
|
Citations
|
Details
Records
Links
Author
Ainge, N.
Title
Registered nurses participation in a professional recognition program. Their responses to nine job related factors
Type
Year
1993
Publication
Abbreviated Journal
Mary Lambie Collection, Canterbury Medical Library
Volume
Issue
Pages
Keywords
Abstract
A simple descriptive longitudinal survey monitoring self- reported incidence of satisfaction/ dissatisfaction to nine job related factors. The two hundred RN's participating in the pilot implementation of the Clinical Career Pathway (Canterbury Area Health Board) were surveyed in June 1992 and February 1993. This was a time of change in New Zealand's Health service
Call Number
NRSNZNO @ research @ 13
Serial
13
Permanent link to this record
Author
Ainge, N.
Title
Report on the pilot implementation of the clinical career pathway for nurses ( CAHB)
Type
Year
1993
Publication
Abbreviated Journal
Mary Lambie Collection Canterbury Medical Library
Volume
Issue
Pages
Keywords
Abstract
During 1992, two hundred Registered Nurses ( RN's) participated in the Pilot Implementation of the Clinical Career Pathway for Nurses. This was conducted according to terms for the Proposal (Shepherd et al 1991) prepared by Nurses throughout the Canterbury Area Health Board.Ten services had a participating ward/ unit. All were volunteers. The framework for a Clinical Career Pathway (CAHB) has six steps. During 1992 attention was focused on the two levels beyond basic functional competency. Nurse Practitioner II, Nurse Specialist. An open system was piloted. There was no change to remuneration. Advancement was- self initiated; by peer review ( the RN was required to meet the performance criteria set by the Unit Nurse Managers.) There was no constraint to numbers advancing. Forty seven RN's advanced to Nurse practitioner II level,nine advanced to Nurse Specialist level.Evaluation covered four areas-1. Qualitative benefits and initiatives to improves patient care. 2. Nurses perception of the project. 3. Benefits of peer review. 4. Secondary gains
Call Number
NRSNZNO @ research @ 93
Serial
93
Permanent link to this record
Select All
Deselect All
<<
1
>>
List View
|
Citations
|
Details
Home
CQL Search
|
Library Search
|
Show Record
|
Extract Citations
Help