| |
Records |
Links |
|
Author |
Börner, Heidi.E |
|
| |
Title |
Evaluating safe patient handling systems: Is there a better way? |
Type |
|
| |
Year |
2008 |
Publication |
|
Abbreviated Journal |
ResearchArchive@Victoria |
|
| |
Volume |
|
Issue |
|
Pages |
|
|
| |
Keywords |
Patient safety; Evaluation research; Occupational health and safety |
|
| |
Abstract |
This observational study analyses the responses of 38 nurses from two similar units that use different patient handling systems to test the reliability and validity of the Safe Patient Handling Survey (TM) SPH Survey(TM), a perception survey and improvement tool for employees and employers. Currently there is a lack of tools for evaluating patient handling systems. The survey contains 55 questions divided into 6 clusters, staff and patient injury and violence questions, and picture questions depicting unsafe techniques. The data were analysed to see how the SPH Survey(TM) scores correlate with incidents, and its ability to detect differences between the two units. The results of the Pearson and Cronbach(TM) alpha tests show strong reliability, validity and consistency of the SPH Survey(TM). ANOVA comparison of means and Spearman(TM) rho tests shows that higher (better) scores on the SPH Survey(TM) clusters correlate with lower numbers of patient injuries, lower reports of verbal and physical violence episodes, and lower staff injuries. Differences were detected between the units with Unit 2 scoring higher than Unit 1 in all SPH Survey(TM) clusters and scoring lower in staff and patient injuries and violence incidents. Although the analysis was limited by the small sample size, the study has created a sound basis for further investigation. The SPH Survey(TM) is shown to be an easy way to reliably evaluate patient handling systems and workplace culture, target improvement initiatives, and continually monitor the level of patient handling risk in the workplace. Low-risk patient handling gives health care providers the means to focus on delivering high quality patient care, without endangering their own health and well-being. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1224 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Brinkman, A.; Caughley, B. |
|
| |
Title |
Measuring on-the-job stress accurately |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2004 |
Publication |
Kai Tiaki: Nursing New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
18 |
Issue |
8 |
Pages |
12-15 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Stress; Evaluation research; Workplace; Occupational health and safety |
|
| |
Abstract |
The authors discuss the usefulness of a generic tool to measure job stress in New Zealand workplaces, and report on a study using one such generic tool. The study involved sending questionnaires to all staff (193) who had worked at a regional women's health service for a minimum of six months. The mailed package contained the Job Stress Survey (JSS), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), demographic questions (including cultural safety), shift work questions, and a blank page for “qualitative comment”. Over 12,000 pieces of data were collected from the study but this article focuses only on the results of the JSS. The JSS can be used to determine a “job stress index” and can also be used to measure “job pressure” and “lack of organisational support”. For this study, job stress index scores were calculated and organised by occupational groupings. Midwives, nurses and doctors all cited inadequate or poor quality equipment, excessive paperwork, insufficient personal time, and frequent interruptions, as their top stressors. Three of these four stressors fall within the job pressure index. The results of the survey prompted organisational changes, including: extensive discussions; equipment being updated; management being made aware of the depth of concern felt by staff; the creation of a place for staff to have personal time; and coping intervention strategies were initiated. The authors suggest that no generic measure of job stress can fully evaluate stressors unique to a particular work setting. They support additional items being constructed and administered to assess stressors that are idiosyncratic to a particular occupational group. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ 1003 |
Serial |
987 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Carryer, J.B.; Gardner, G.; Dunn, S.; Gardner, A. |
|
| |
Title |
The core role of the nurse practitioner: Practice, professionalism and clinical leadership |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2007 |
Publication |
Journal of Clinical Nursing |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
16 |
Issue |
10 |
Pages |
1818-1825 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Professional competence; Nurse practitioners; Evaluation research; Cross-cultural comparison |
|
| |
Abstract |
This article draws on empirical evidence to illustrate the core role of nurse practitioners in Australia and New Zealand. A study jointly commissioned by both countries' Regulatory Boards developed information of the newly created nurse practitioner role, to develop shared competency and educational standards. This interpretive study used multiple data sources, including published and grey literature, policy documents, nurse practitioner programme curricula and interviews with 15 nurse practitioners from the two countries. The core role of the nurse practitioner was identified as having three components: dynamic practice, professional efficacy and clinical leadership. Nurse practitioner practice is dynamic and involves the application of high level clinical knowledge and skills in a wide range of contexts. The nurse practitioner demonstrates professional efficacy, enhanced by an extended range of autonomy that includes legislated privileges. The nurse practitioner is a clinical leader with a readiness and an obligation to advocate for their client base and their profession at the systems level of health care. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
932 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Clendon, J. |
|
| |
Title |
Nurse-managed clinics: Issues in evaluation |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2003 |
Publication |
Journal of Advanced Nursing |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
44 |
Issue |
6 |
Pages |
558-565 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Evaluation research; Nurse managers; Qualiltative research; Patient satisfaction |
|
| |
Abstract |
This article explores the importance of evaluation of nurse-managed clinics using the Mana Health Clinic in Auckland, as an example. Fourth generation evaluation is offered as an appropriate methodology for undertaking evaluation of nurse-managed clinics. Fourth generation evaluation actively seeks involvement of clients in the process and outcome of the evaluation, resulting in participation and empowerment of stakeholders in the service – a precept often forgotten in traditional evaluation strategies and of vital importance in understanding why people use nurse-managed clinics. The method proposed here also incorporates the need for quantitative data. The main argument is that a combination of qualitative and quantitative data sources is likely to give the greatest understanding of nurse-managed clinics' utilisation. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
949 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Clendon, J.; Krothe, J. |
|
| |
Title |
The nurse-managed clinic: An evaluative study |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2004 |
Publication |
Nursing Praxis in New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
20 |
Issue |
2 |
Pages |
15-23 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Evaluation research; Nurse managers; Primary health care; Cross-cultural comparison |
|
| |
Abstract |
Part of an international project, the aim of this study was to evaluate a nurse managed primary health care clinic (Mana Health Clinic) from the perspectives of users, funders, and providers of clinical services in order to identify factors which contribute to success. The method used was Fourth Generation Evaluation (FGE) whereby, consistent with the methodological precepts of the constructivist enquiry paradigm, there was active involvement of clients in the process and outcome of the evaluation. Open-ended interviews were conducted with 13 individuals and one focus group. The data yielded four main categories: factors that contribute to success; contrasting past experience of health care with that of nurse-managed care; the effectiveness of nurse-managed care; and suggestions for change in current practice. The authors note that the results to date support a tentative conclusion of success for the clinic. As the study is on-going, summaries of the four categories were fed back to the participants for further discussion and interpretation and eventual integration with data from the similar study being undertaken in the United States. The authors conclude that this paper demonstrates how the use of an appropriate method of evaluation can itself contribute to the success of the nurse managed clinic. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
547 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Holloway, K. T.; Pearson, J.R. |
|
| |
Title |
Trailblazers: Primary health care programme evaluation |
Type |
Conference Article |
| |
Year |
2005 |
Publication |
|
Abbreviated Journal |
coda, An Institutional Repository for the New Zealand ITP Sector |
|
| |
Volume |
Paper presented June 2004 at Royal New Zealand Plu |
Issue |
|
Pages |
|
|
| |
Keywords |
New graduate nurses; Primary health care; Evaluation research; Professional development |
|
| |
Abstract |
This report is an evaluation of the academic journey undertaken by a group of newly graduated nurses who were sponsored by a New Zealand district health board to work in a variety of primary health care nursing settings. The impetus for this pilot employment option was the Ministry of Health's focus on primary health care nursing and workforce development for this sector and the Expert Advisory Committee for primary health care nursing's recommendations to district health boards regarding employment of graduate nurses and support for them to engage in post graduate study. Evaluation participants were primarily the graduate nurses who were interviewed at the end of their first year of practice which was following programme completion then again nine to ten months later. Findings include the nurses reflections on what supported them and what acted to impede as barriers to their learning success and practice development. The report concludes with five recommendations that can be used to ensure that the travels of future newly graduated nurses taking this pathway are supported, safe and successful. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
1200 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Horsburgh, M.; Smith, V.A.; Kivell, D. |
|
| |
Title |
South Auckland community paediatric nursing service: A framework for evaluation |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2002 |
Publication |
Nursing Praxis in New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
18 |
Issue |
3 |
Pages |
40-49 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Paediatric nursing; Community health nursing; Evaluation research |
|
| |
Abstract |
This paper describes the Kidz First paediatric community homecare nursing team in South Auckland. While the service was not initially planned as an integrated approach to child health, its evolution reflects the move to more community based care delivery and the expansion of nurse-led initiatives in New Zealand. The components of a community paediatric home nursing team as described by Eaton (2000) are used to provide the framework with which to describe the service. A focus group held with the Kidz First paediatric community homecare nurses has enabled definition of the key nursing components provided to children and their families living in South Auckland. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
622 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Kaviani, N.; Stillwell, Y. |
|
| |
Title |
An evaluative study of clinical preceptorship |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2000 |
Publication |
Nurse Education Today |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
20 |
Issue |
3 |
Pages |
218-226 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Preceptorship; Nursing; Education; Evaluation research |
|
| |
Abstract |
A preceptorship programme of 100 hours duration was developed and delivered by a nurse education institute, in consultation with a health care organisation. The purpose of the study was to examine preceptors, preceptees, and nurse managers' preceptions of the preceptor role and factors which influenced the performance of preceptors. Using focus groups, participants were each asked to identify the outcomes of the programme in practice. Study findings highlighted the importance of formal preceptor preparation, personal and professional development of the preceptors, and the promotion of positive partnerships between nurse educators and nurse practitioners. The need for formal recognition of the preceptor role in practice, particularly in relation to the provision of adequate time and resources, emerged from the study. The research findings enabled the development of an evaluative model of preceptorship, which highlights the intrinsic and extrinsic factors impacting on the preceptor role |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
654 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
| |
|
| |
|
Author |
Smith, M.C. |
|
| |
Title |
Reviewing the role of a mental health nurse practitioner |
Type |
Journal Article |
| |
Year |
2008 |
Publication |
Kai Tiaki: Nursing New Zealand |
Abbreviated Journal |
|
|
| |
Volume |
14 |
Issue |
3 |
Pages |
20-22 |
|
| |
Keywords |
Psychiatric Nursing; Nurse practitioners; Evaluation research; Professional competence |
|
| |
Abstract |
The author describes his experience of five years as a nurse practitioner in mental health at Waikato District Health Board. A recent review of the role gave him the opportunity to reflect on the learning associated with assuming the nurse practitioner role. A key area of learning has been in negotiating the shifting responsibilities and changing relationships associated with his role as an nurse practitioner and also as a Responsible Clinician, a role traditionally held by psychiatrists. The Responsible Clinician role is a statutory one under the Mental Health Act (1992), generally performed by psychiatrists but open to other suitably qualified professionals. He reports the results of a review based on feedback from fellow professionals, clients and their families, along with quantitative data from basic statistics connected to the role, such as a time and motion study. The review asked fellow professionals to rate the performance of the nurse practitioner against the Nursing Council competencies. These results indicate the nurse practitioner role is of some value and that other professionals and clients seem satisfied with the role. There is some evidence it is delivering outcomes acceptable to clients and other professionals. The study has many limitations which are discussed, such as a poor response rate and short time frame. Further research is planned to evaluate this role. |
|
| |
Call Number |
NRSNZNO @ research @ |
Serial |
993 |
|
| Permanent link to this record |
